The sacrifices I was raised on: how empathy brings us closer to a radical politic of family

 

Art by Micah Bazant

Art by Micah Bazant

Originally posted at http://www.reproductivejusticeblog.org

Also cross-posted at Feministing

My biological dad was in prison when I was little. My mom, single at the time, would drive me, my brother, and sister to see him. Because I was little, I don’t have a lot of memories of this time, but I do remember one thing. At the prison, an impassable glass partition separated my dad and me. I couldn’t touch him and he couldn’t touch me. We talked on a black, scratchy phone that connected the two sides of the glass. It was brief and sad. 

During the time my dad was in prison, my mom worked several jobs. She was a single parent to my siblings and me and was forced to work around the clock to support us. Because of this, her time with us was limited. When she was away at work—which was often—Dora and Betty and another woman whose name I can’t remember cared for us. My mom was committed to making sure we had food and clothes and somewhere to live, things got to take for granted. Betty and Dora and the woman whose name I can’t remember were all undocumented immigrant women from Guatemala. They spoke little English and sometimes spent the night at our house. One of my brother’s first words was zapato (Spanish for shoe). It wasn’t until I became aware of the fight for domestic workers’ rights that I realized that these women from Guatemala were taking care of us so they could take care of their families. How maddening to recognize that the cycles of poverty that we face today are the same as those our parents experienced decades ago.

Writing this I started over two and three and four times. It wasn’t until the fifth try that I understood that my mom, my biological dad, and the women from Guatemala shared a common thread—their lives were divided by partitions, literally and figuratively. But the fight for a living wage, to end mass incarceration, and to create comprehensive policies on immigration and a pathway to citizenship, all of these threaten to topple the barriers affecting our most impacted communities: immigrants, poor people, and people of color—often one in the same.

My biological dad, my mom, and the women from Guatemala were kept away from their families by partitions, fences, glass ceilings, and social prejudices. What held these dividers in place was bureaucratic red tape; the kind that builds on outdated notions of what families look like and what they deserve. The kind of red tape that forces immigrant families to wait fifteen years for health care; the kind of red tape that keeps same-sex couples from marriage, second-parent adoption, and spousal benefits; the kind of red tape that limits access to comprehensive sex education, access to contraception, reproductive healthcare, and culturally appropriate resources for families of color; the kind of red tape that allows border patrol officers to shoot and kill families desperate for a better quality of life. This red tape is responsible for the deaths of millions. In the process, we’re becoming desensitized to empathy.

No matter how hard we fight, when we are denied fair and just opportunities to care for our families and ourselves we can’t thrive. Erosive policies don’t just punish rather than protect—they break us. They break families who travel thousands of miles, leaving their homes, everything they’ve ever known, only to be slaughtered at the border; they break the mother who sold her last possession to save her dying child because health care policies failed her; they break the black teenage boy who before he’s old enough to vote is sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole; they broke my 25-year-old cousin, Candace, who died one year ago next month, her beautiful life cut drastically short, because of healthcare policies that erase the experiences and needs of poor people. Our families, my biological dad, my mom, and the women from Guatemala ask for basic human rights—healthy food, affordable healthcare, and the opportunity to make a living wage. It can’t be in good conscience that decision makers refuse us the rights, recognition, and resources we need to thrive.

As we approach mother’s day, I’m thinking about my mom and the women from Guatemala and the millions of other mothers who are undermined because of inhumane policies and practices. Our democratic processes are not enough; we must share our stories and create a culture of empathy, and we must make visible the invisible experiences of the poorest among us. By gathering and sharing our stories, we can build a culture that recognizes and respects the wide variety of strong families that build our communities.

The pathway to citizenship is not paved with chocolate. Breakfast in bed doesn’t replace affordable healthcare. Flowers won’t keep the lights on or cure hunger. This year give moms something they really need. Join strong Families in celebrating Mama’s Day Our Way, a campaign set out to reach and highlight the mothers who are often overlooked in the mainstream celebration of Mother’s Day. Send an e-card that reflects what our families really look like. Add a message that calls out policies that punish rather than protect. Take action to support comprehensive immigration reform. Families are the basic building block of our society and the support of a strong family makes it possible for people to thrive. Help us make that a reality for all families.

This post is part of the Strong Families Mama’s Day Our Way celebration. You can read more posts in the series on the Strong Families blogStrong Families is a national initiative led by Forward Together. Our goal is to change the way people think, act and talk about families.


Soapbox: Writings from The Frisky

Screen Shot 2013-03-30 at 4.54.04 PM

 

Embracing the idea of writing for different kinds of online mags/spaces, I’ve started contributing to The Frisky. Check it out:

The Soapbox: Should White Women Be On The Cover Of ‘Black Magazines’?

The always-inquisitive Jada Pinkett-Smith recently posed a question that has many people scratching their heads and some folks outright upset. In short, she’s wondering if black women ask to be represented in mainstream media, on the covers of magazines like Vanity Fair, shouldn’t white women be represented on the covers of traditionally black magazines like EssenceEbony and JET?

The answer? Yes and no.

It’s not enough to have this discussion without a little bit of context. We didn’t come to this dilemma out of nowhere. There is a long, difficult history that informs our current dynamics around race that can’t and shouldn’t be overlooked. This country has a long history of exclusion and the many movements for equal rights and access including the women’s movement and the Civil Rights movement (both of which black women fought in) reminds us that every person is not considered deserving and some of us had to, and still have to, fight for representation. Read more

The Soapbox: Lisa Lampanelli’s Racist Schtick Abuses The Art Of Comedy

Insult comedian Lisa Lampanelli has made headlines again – for all the wrong reasons. Last week during the Writers Guild Awards, she shamelessly tweeted a picture of she and HBO “Girls” producer and star, Lena Dunham captioned “Me with my Ni**a @LenaDunham of @HBOGirls – I love this beyotch!!”

The interwebs erupted with rage as yet another privileged white comedian made a “joke” at the expense of the Black experience. The ubiquitous nature of racism means while we see and hear it everywhere, we’re rarely given the opportunity to understand the motivation behind it. Lampanelli’s entire shtick is to exploit the sensitive nature of race and homosexuality and to make money from abusing the art of comedy, not taking responsibility for the social implications of her “work.” Read more

The Soapbox: On Getting A Black “Bachelorette”

Pediatric dentist Dr. Misee Harris of Kentucky is petitioning to become the first ever Black “Bachelorette.” This prospect means a lot is surfacing for me regarding the harmful stereotypes reinforced by women of color on reality television. How would she be received? If she did get an opportunity to be on the show and chose a non-black man, what would the social implications of that be? But more than that, I feel disheartened because I know that this reality reflects how America feels about who deserves to be happy and who doesn’t.

Author and commentator Keli Goff argued on The Huffington Post that “The Bachelor” and “The Bachelorette”‘s collective 25 seasons with no Black people in the coveted role isn’t an act of racism. I disagree. Society tells us that marriage and the supposed happiness that is derived from it aren’t meant for everyone — hence the multi-decade struggle to legalize the right of gay folks to marry. This reality reflects how Americans feel about who deserves to be happy and who doesn’t. Whether these exclusions are purposeful are irrelevant; many of us consciously reject stereotypes yet still hold subconscious negative associations about people who are different than we are, TV execs included. It’s an implicit bias (subconscious prejudice) that informs their decisions about who they choose to be on the show. These  executives genuinely fear what putting a Black man or woman front and center might do to their ratings – and as voyeurs, we’re often not privy to those kinds of conversations. Read More


The story that’s taken ten years to tell: On abortion, race and the power of story

Image
 
Originally posted at Crunk Feminist Collective on Jan 22, 2013 
by Shanelle Matthews
 
“Are you in college?” The doctor could tell from my face I wasn’t at all interested in having a conversation. “You speak well. I mean, you’re articulate.” The wrinkles in my forehead deepened. I wrung my fingers tightly around the scratchy, blue exam gown and briefly thought about the woman who wore it before me; what was she like? I looked at him, desperately wanting to not have to actually speak, wishing he could just read my mind. “Yes. I’m in college,” I responded shortly. I was really thinking, “That’s none of your business and really, is this the time to make small talk? When your elbow is deep in my vagina?” But I was grateful for him so I frowned and looked away. The room didn’t feel particularly uncomfortable. I mostly gazed at the ceiling tiles, counting square by square. Occasionally I peeked down. Over the long sheet that draped my knees I could see my feet, not really manicured, resting awkwardly in the titanium stirrups, straddling the doctor’s full head of curly hair. “We’re just about done.” I sighed out a breath of relief. My abortion was almost over.

My abortion experience isn’t the kind that might be featured in a Lifetime movie. By that I mean I was 18, technically an adult. I consented to having sex, although I had never learned how to really protect myself. I lived in California, which is a state that provides emergency Medicaid for women who need financial assistance to help cover the costs of abortion care. The circumstances in which I found myself were not particularly difficult but only because at the time I didn’t know any better.

I was 6 months out of high school, a full-time student-athlete living away from home. I was privileged enough to be going to college and receiving some scholarship money to do so. One day during practice I found myself violently ill. Workouts were hard and often induced vomiting but not like this. I counted the days since my last period and realized I may be pregnant. 

I was dating my teammate who was several years older than me. He was sexually experienced and while I wasn’t a virgin, I had dated mostly women and not been very sexually involved with men. He said he used protection. I believed him. 

Upon receiving my pregnancy test results at the student health center the nurse searchingly said “Congratulations?” Her quizzical tone confused me. I gave her the side eye and told her that I was on the track team and wouldn’t be celebrating this pregnancy. She pointed me in the direction of Planned Parenthood.

I walked and sobbed. I could hear my dad’s harsh, deep voice. “Keep your legs closed! Boys only want one thing from you!” My parents meant well but in my home sex education was a combination of scare tactics, none of which taught me how to effectively and safely prepare for sex. I can’t remember learning in school the importance of contraception or the implications of becoming pregnant or getting an STD. I do vaguely remember coming to school some days and someone would be missing. The hallways were filled with whispers that “she’d gotten knocked up and sent to the school for pregnant girls.” In hindsight, how fucked up is that?

Abortions are expensive. I didn’t have any money and even though I knew my parents would probably help me, I was scared to tell them. They’d be so disappointed. Planned Parenthood sent me to see if I qualified for emergency Medicaid. I did. The office was bustling with people desperate to get financial assistance for themselves and their sick family members. The clerk was helpful but blunt. She couldn’t be bothered with details and why should she have to be? 

I had to lie to my coaches. I couldn’t tell them I had an abortion. What would they think of me? I kept it from all but one or two of my teammates. I felt a lot of shame about my decision. Not because I thought it was morally wrong but because I had to hide it from so many people in my life. The stigma around abortion meant that I had to lie to people because telling them opened me up to unnecessarily punitive judgment. The hardest part about having an abortion was the stigmatizing environment in which I was having it. I knew it was the only decision for me and even though I didn’t know a lot of women who had them, I knew they were ashamed—so I was ashamed too. We’ve created a culture in which we’ve attached a certain set of feelings to a specific set of circumstances. I was ashamed and grieving out of obligation when all I really felt was relief.

Ten years later there is so much about my abortion story that’s more fucked up than I could understand then. The shame that is associated with abortion and other difficult reproductive health decisions forces women to display an act of grieving whether they feel that way or not. The alternative meaning you’re entirely morally bankrupt. The doctor’s comment about my being articulate meant he had made some assumptions about me, (and other women who sat straddling his head full of curls). What the implications of those assumptions are I didn’t know but it felt unnerving. Every day I work in reproductive justice trying to compel other people to be brave and share their stories but it has taken me a decade to tell this story and that’s because even within the “movement” there is stigma. 

I identify as a Black, queer woman. My Blackness makes my story all the more problematic for some people. The assumptions that are made about Black women’s reproductive decisions mean that I will receive less compassion and acceptance than my white counterparts for having had an abortion—especially because I’m not repentant about it. As organizers we are not always aware of our implicit biases but there are plenty of white people who in an effort to make abortion safe and accessible are reaffirming negative stereotypes about women of color. This happens through negligent storytelling that says there is a right and wrong way to have the need to access an abortion. 

The narrative that abortion gives women and transpeople an opportunity to live the rest of our lives, to become a doctor or a lawyer or whatever isn’t true for everyone. For some of us, abortion just provides one more day. One more day to live our lives exactly the way we want to. For some of us the decision isn’t political, it’s essential. It is essential to taking care of the children we already have, to circumventing difficult medical experiences or to just not be pregnant. There is nothing heroic about having an abortion. It is an essential part of reproductive health care.

Every year on the anniversary of my abortion I take off of work. Not to grieve but to celebrate: because of my right to choose, I am living my best life. Making the decision to have an abortion didn’t mean I had the rest of my life, it just meant that I had one more day to live exactly the way I wanted and for that I’m grateful.

Shanelle Matthews is a creative, blogger and all around communications enthusiast. She is the Communications Manager at Forward Together and is a participant in the Strong Families project,Echoing Ida. Follow her @freedom_writer 

This post is part of Still Wading: Forty years of resistance, resilience and reclamation in communities of color, a series by Strong Families commemorating the 40th anniversary of Roe v Wade.
 

On ‘Django’ and the negligence of popular culture

Review < Observation

A.O. Scott’s ornamentally tailored Times review of ‘Django Unchained’ is excellently written but leaves out two analysis important for movies with historically complex plotlines – socio-historical and cause and effect. I’m not a trained historian and don’t have the skill set to evaluate the omitted socio-historical consideration, so I wont; but one thing in particular was painfully obvious to me – because of the vacillating relationship between popular culture and education we’ve become negligently uninformed. Unfortunately, for many of us, that is a luxury we cannot afford.

It is my personal belief that as a filmmaker (not a self-identified documentarian), Quentin Tarantino is not responsible for educating folks about the historical significance and implications of slavery however, because we live in a country that is more invested in popular culture (including the exploitation and avidity of genocidal, colonial legal institutions like slavery) than education, we are consciously and unconsciously propagating a careless discourse among a nation of folks who have no racial analysis. In other words, because we don’t teach people shit in school about race or other social constructs they leave the theater having received their education (which sometimes informs their behavior) from the likes of Tarantino and Spielberg. This kind of edification leaves the most vulnerable people (LGBT, people of color, women, immigrants, etc.) at the center of an oblivious shit storm.

In response to my frustration, yesterday someone said, “If you want historical accuracy go see Lincoln or watch Roots, otherwise just appreciate the storytelling and great filmmaking.” Lincoln was not historically accurate but that aside, only someone with the privilege of education (obviously unwilling to acknowledge it) would say this.

I know that when I walk into a movie theater I can choose to wear one of two hats: excited, movie enthusiast who will laugh, cry and emote throughout or social and racial justice activist who will hyper-analyze every “nigger,” “bitch” and cringe-inducing scene that appropriates the culture and experiences of marginalized people. I can leave and write something like this or write nothing but feel completely satisfied that I know the difference between what the media teaches us and what really exists.

Django-Unchained-wallpapers-1920x1200-2

It is entirely possible, encouraged even, to both watch a movie and be entertained and to think critically about how filmmakers have the luxury of making art (and money) without considering the precarious social implications of  their work. Pending your radicalism, you may decide all together to avoid movies whose historical complexity isn’t coupled with an authentic and comprehensible analysis or like me you may reconcile that some battles can’t be won. Tarantino and other filmmakers have a lot of money to tease out their fantasies. And sadly, they have the privilege of not caring either way how their films inform public opinion – and they don’t have to — but it would be nice if they did. Even better would be a public schooling system that provided every citizen with a comprehensive and expansive global history lesson so upon entering the movie theatre we are all equipped with the skill set to separate fact from fiction.

A.O. Scott called ‘Django Unchained’ “brazily entertaining, brazenly irresponsible and also ethically serious,” and it is all of those. It is both excellently made and very difficult watch. It condemns slavery but delivers some of the most gruesome images I’ve ever seen in doing so. The liberal use of the word “nigger/nigga” and the reverberating laughs from the white faces next to me made my heart sink. Still, I was emotionally moved to tears, laughter and several reactions in between.  I feel some kind of way about Tarantino, a white man, making a U.S. slavery revenge fantasy. I also know that all any living person knows about U.S. slavery is a second hand experience, typically learned through reading and research. Still, welcoming it would have been easier if the director was of the African diaspora.

Exploring the nuanced complexities of movies like “Django” is important to expanding our understanding of how art informs popular culture and therefore public opinion. And while each of us experiences it differently we would all be better served with more contexts, more education and an opportunity to have critical conversations about race and privilege. Tarantino had to know that making this movie, as a White man, would resonate heavily (both positively and negatively) with people of color everywhere; and if that opens up a conduit for honest dialogue, well then it is worth every penny.

Follow me: @freedom_writer 

 

 


Opponents of Medicaid Expansion Adopt Reganesque View of the Mentally Ill

photo (6)

Sasha Matthews watches as her 4-year-old son Gavin sleeps soundly in his bed. The soft, paisley printed blankets hugging his small frame – his left foot hanging loosely off the edge. She watches his chest rise and fall and wonders when, if ever, Gavin will look her in the eye and say, “I love you.” Gavin is one of many children born with autism, a spectrum disorder that affects a person’s ability to communicate and interact with others.  Like many other parents of children on the spectrum, Sasha is optimistic that through rigorous therapy and treatment, Gavin will lead a healthy and happy life – free of the stigma that often plagues the mentally underdeveloped. However, she doesn’t have many people advocating for her, especially not the Governor of the state where she and Gavin call home.

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal is one of several Republican governors who have vowed to reject the federal plan to expand Medicaid under President Obama’s Affordable Care Act. The national health laws Medicaid expansion says that the federal government will pay the full cost of the expansion through 2016. After that, the states will only pick up 5 percent of the cost through 2019, and 10 percent of the cost thereafter helping to cover an estimated 7 million more Americans. States would benefit tremendously from this federally supported subsidy and millions more Americans would have access to healthcare.

Louisiana is facing is a nearly 860 million dollar budget cut to its Medicaid program as a result of a change in the state’s Medicaid funding formula to correct what has been characterized as an error in the funding that allowed the state to draw down more federal money than it should have. The state of Medicaid coverage in Louisiana is already dismal. Most states base Medicaid eligibility for parents on household income and how it compares to the federal poverty level, which was $18,530 for a family of three in 2011. In Louisiana, the eligibility cutoff for a working parent is 25 percent of federal poverty or $4,633 for a family of three. Effectively if you make more than $5,000 a year, you do not qualify for Medicaid.

Due to these cuts, Southeast Louisiana Hospital (SELH), home to over 200 mental health patients, will soon begin the closure process.  Officials of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals have been vague about how they will provide services for the psychiatric patients (including adolescent and adult patients with Autism). Without insurance, Medicare or Medicaid these patients will be displaced. This places a burden on the poorest and most impacted people in the state, a burden that policy makers are familiarly dismissive of.

During his post WWII tenure as Governor of California (in an effort to realign the economy) Ronald Regan began closing all state funded mental facilities and cutting aid to federally funded community mental health programs. This left the country in a haze of confusion as those with little to no mental capacity were discharged with nowhere to go. Patients were left homeless. Families were burdened with relatives they could not care for overall confirming the fast growing notion that those with the least mattered least.

52% of all the money Louisiana spends on Medicaid services is allocated to people with disabilities. Similar to Regan’s economic realignment policies, the state budget cuts will leave the mentally ill in a precarious limbo.  The cuts, coupled with the rejection of the Medicaid expansion bill, will leave hundreds of thousands of psychiatric patients and their families guessing about their access to quality healthcare, including Sasha and Gavin.

Accessing quality resources to help Gavin hurdle the barriers of autism is a constant struggle for Sasha. Yet, knowing they live in a state that refuses to prioritize the needs of people with disabilities leaves her gravely concerned for his future. If hospitals like Southeast Louisiana, that have serviced patients with disabilities for over 60 years, fall victim to unfair budgets cuts, where will people like Sasha and Gavin go for help?


The elusiveness of being well-adjusted. A reflection on my 28th birthday

Photo on 6-28-12 at 10.00 AM #6

I’m fumbling tremendously over my words; feeling insecure about exposing some of the intimate details of my dysfunctional life, but I’ve learned the hard way that only in vulnerability will I find reprieve. As someone who has made a profession out of communicating, I feel anxious to put out such an inarticulate, emotionally-driven, fact-less, messy tirade but really that’s all I ever am on my birthday; a sobbing, crazy inarticulate, cerebrally-scattered mess. And this birthday is no different; in fact I’m more unsure than ever about who I am and what my purpose is and I am not okay with that but am defenseless against life’s constraint to inform self-awareness with experience. Fuck you Benjamin Button, you lucky bastard.

The theme by which I’ve found myself consumed by is reconciliation. Reasoning with myself about the many experiences I’m navigatingand whether or not I’m doing it “right.” What is right? Wrong? And then I end up here; in the familiar face of existentialism despite learning long ago that it isn’t valuable to me, a queer, Black, working-class woman. Of course there is a right and wrong, my mere existence if proof of that. Whether I acknowledge it or not, there are social constructs in place that inform the way I move through the world – stories were told about me long before I was born. It’s no wonder being a “well-adjusted” adult is so hard. In a world that pushes back on my every breath, “well adjusted” isn’t tangible. It’s an illusion. 

I’m grateful to have the mental capacity to pen this, the rational to know this will look very different next year and the humor to be able to laugh at all the ways in which I am completely fucked up. I believe so strongly in the power of friendship, vulnerability and openness to heal and guide us, so I’m opening myself up to share some of the experiences that have helped shape me.

Growing up, my dad would tell my sister and I “You have two strikes against you, you’re a woman and you’re Black” (and later a third strike when I came out). As I’ve evolved, I’ve challenged the metaphors he used to describe the challenges I would face in my life – but the point came across; life wont be easy for you because of what you look like – and later, because of who you love.  Moving through the world as a queer, woman of color has proven to be both difficult and extremely rewarding. I’m advantaged in that I’ve been given the opportunity assess what privileges I’ve been denied and those I’ve had access to and what that means for me and the people around me.

The daily circumvention of sexism, racism and homophobia is an emotionally draining exercise. Realizing your worth in a society that doesn’t place any value on you can be not just arduous, but dangerous. But once I understood, fundamentally, the root of my struggle, I knew I that it was mine to keep. No amount of bargaining or brokering could get me to trade it or give it away – because in this struggle is a legacy more potent and powerful than any other. A legacy rooted in strength, self-awareness, resiliency, humility and well-being and through this struggle and legacy I’ve found my purpose and that’s an unparalleled lesson worth every tear.

This purpose doesn’t come without a price. Sanctimoniousness aside, I’ve got a lot of crazy and dysfunction (relative to my character) to work through – in no small part because of the many landscapes I’m required to navigate. The illusiveness of online communication can lead us to believe that no one but us is completely fucking up this life thing so I’ve spent countless hours over-analyzing why I’m the only person I know having a hard time becoming a “well-adjusted” adult; why my anxiety can sometimes run my life or why it takes me multiple tries to learn the same lesson, why I judge and then pretend I’m not judging , why I take up a lot of space in conversations, why I rarely finish books from beginning to end, overextend myself and am somehow just now learning to say “I don’t know.” Why I start projects and don’t finish them, why I’m self-conscious about my body but pretend not to be because “that’s not strong,” why I’m negligently direct or why I judge myself for finishing a bottle of wine in one sitting. I’m also not always honest about the fact that I don’t like some people for no good reason. There is a long laundry list of other shit I have trouble sitting with in silence and most of the time I have no idea how to “fix” it.

What’s saved me from the pits of self-loathing has been commiserating conversations with people. I rely on hearing stories about the hard parts, taking a deep breath and exhaling with relief that I’m not the only crazy one, that the fights, struggles, disappointments and embarrassments are not unique to my dysfunctional life and relationships and that everyone else is just as fucked up as me  – only better at hiding it. Learning that other people have a hard time saying “I don’t know” “I was wrong” “it was my fault” also reminds me that my instinct to protect myself and in some cases my selfishness is innate in other folks too. There is relief and growth in swapping struggle stories.

Through these conversations (and a lot of self-reflection) I’ve made some adjustments to the way I live that have not saved me from the fight for “well-adjustment” or making mistakes but have given me some cushion so I don’t fall so hard.  

  • I’m more honest than ever about what I’m good at and in which areas I need improvement. Lying to others and myself about my abilities is counterproductive and can be wounding.
  • I realize that traditional institutions like marriage require a compromise of self that I can’t and should not be asked to deliver. My relationships require a radical form of decolonial love that must be shaped specifically from my experiences – not templates.
  • I have vices. I like them. I am lucky to not have addictions, but only marginally so.
  • Awkward silences don’t need to be filled with monotonous conversation.  That kind of exchange often leads to insincerity. 
  • Everything doesn’t happen for a reason. There’s almost always a chain of events that we have some control over. Things happen because we make them happen.
  • My energy isn’t compatible with everyone but few people are willing to openly acknowledge that lest they become as couth-less and tactless as I. 
  • I’ve spent years fighting stereotypes only to realize that some parts of me fit wholly and completely into that neat, little, compartmentalized box and that’s okay. We need to shift our language, not ourselves.
  • I’ve made so so so so so many mistakes. Mistake after mistake after mistake. But it wasn’t until I understood more readily the reasons behind my actions – my uncertainty, my mistrustfulness, my fear – that I could have more control over what kind of mistakes I made and the impact they would have on my life.

To add one more thing to this jargon[y] post I will say this: My perspective of what is “right, functional and well-adjusted” has been rooted in white supremacists ideology and up until now I haven’t had the mental capacity to reassess that how I move through the world reflects my determinants of success.

I am happy with my progress and grateful for the stability to ink this and reflect next year on my continued growth.


Straddling the both / and experience

Image: Kortney Ryan Ziegler

This blog was originally posted on the Strong Families blog at http://www.reproductivejusticeblog.org

My work never really feels like work because it is so inherently intertwined with the way I move through the world. I communicate and create visibility for reproductive justice because my experiences as a queer woman of color, means that I don’t get to separate my race and socio-economic status from my reproductive health choices. I am both a person of color AND a woman. I am both queer AND working class. I am always both/and without having the luxury of disregarding my multiple realities, which I don’t want to nor should I be forced to.

As I left work last Friday, I didn’t leave behind my worried thoughts about whether or not Governor Brown would finally stop the shackling of pregnant women or grant domestic workers their human right to sick days and earning living wages. Whether sitting at my desk, at home or somewhere else, I am always conscious of the compromises that those of us with multiple realities have to make. We either get to keep our families together or we get healthcare. We choose between safe arrangements for our children with the risk of deportation or we are collectively uprooted from the place that we call home. Even though we live our lives straddling the both/and experience, our choices very rarely reflect it.

When I got the email Friday night that Governor Brown passed AB2530, the anti-shackling bill, which supports pregnant women in California’s prisons, I celebrated. After all, wins are so few and far between for us that it would be almost boorish to not at least share a toast or do a happy dance. And because for three years my colleagues have busted their asses to sustain basic human rights for pregnant women – an avoidable fight that we should not have had to spend any time or resources fighting. When I heard that Governor Brown signed AB2015, a bill that will make it possible for parents who are detained by the police to make safe arrangements for their children, I grinned ear-to-ear with excitement of the good news. Although my cynicism and distrust of the legislative process remains intact, these wins are smaller pieces of a very large, muddled puzzle that we are fighting both through policy change and efforts on the ground. But for the moment I smiled and shared the news with those around me, thankful for some glimmer of goodness.

Staying away from my computer for the weekend I came in to work Monday to find out that Governor Brown had vetoed both the Domestic Workers Bill of Rights bill and the Trust Act. I found myself, and the people around me, once again straddling the arduous both / and line. Happy that we had some wins and devastated, too.

We know that the same communities who will continue to live without healthcare are also under the constant threat of deportation. The same person who risks unwarranted deportation also isn’t receiving healthcare. The same person who is fighting for a living wage, also risks finding themselves in need of safe arrangements for their children should they be detained. What Governor Brown and policy makers nationwide fail to realize is that we are not monolithic in our needs. Passing a couple of bills won’t pacify us. We deserve asylum, healthcare, living wages, humane treatment, sick days and to be treated with respect and dignity – all of our basic human rights. Our families are strongest when we can be accepted as both / and.

Martin Luther King told us “an injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” This is especially true for those us who are fighting to be our whole selves in this country. As we celebrate the victories and mourn the losses of the weekend, we urge Governor Brown to consider that denying domestic workers their rights threatens all of our rights. We hope that you’ll join us in telling the Governor that he can’t sacrifice some for the betterment of others. We are all deserving of the rights, recognition and resources we need to be our best selves and for our families to thrive.

Send Governor Brown this tweet: @JerrybrownGov We deserve all of our human rights! Reconsider the Domestic Workers BOR & Trust Act. #strongfams

Shanelle Matthews is a blogger, new and online media professional and the Communications Manager at forward Together.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,769 other followers